So this is a real question. To RCR and the vets here….
We keep taking about the odds not being in favor of any of these MLC marriages surviving. Too many variables. I get it.
HOWEVER, the notion that the MLCer eventually does want to reconcile. That % and statistic would be more meaningful to me and other LBS.
I mean. If 10% of marriages end up in reconciliation, so be it. But if 90% of MLCers would want to reconcile after whatever number of years. That would be a meaningful piece of information for LBS understanding of this damn thing.
I know some MLCers never return and fantasy land works out. BUT, what % or MLCers at the end of it all want to reconcile even if they cant.
Please, this is a real question. Any info is appreciated.
Hi Why, your question is very good, for me the answer has 3 dimensions.
Even if we had statistics I am not sure that would change things. By example if we knew for sure that 90% of MLCers will want to reconcile, what would change ? We would have expectations that every single MLCer would do it, no ? And having expectations we might change the outcome... For daily peace of mind, I prefer to keep NE.
Then there is the time : timeframe is an unknown. Let's imagine we have statistics like :
MLCers wanting to reconcile within 1 year -> 5 %
MLCers wanting to reconcile 1 year - 2 years -> 10%
MLCers wanting to reconcile 2 year - 5 years -> 40%
MLCers wanting to reconcile 5 year - 10 years -> 25%
MLCers wanting to reconcile 10 years + -> 10%
What would that change for each individual case ? The odds look positive, but who is willing to wait 1 year, 10 years or 20 years ? Many people would say "I don't want to loose this time", no ?
Then there is the damage : what amount of damage and pain are we able to suffer, on our weelbeing, on our children, on our finances ? And this last question needs to be balanced imo with the amount of damage that will have "non standing" (on children, on finances, etc.)
Each crisis is different in duration and intensity, Standing is an individual choice, I would add that it is a daily choice. Some LBS set up boundaries like time limit, PA limit, or divorce limit, and it is fine. Some other LBS don't set up boundaries in advance, but when they feel they are they move on, and it is fine.
The first purpose of Standing, imo, is for the benefit of the Stander : healing, detaching, GAL, protecting finances are healthy advises. Paving the path for reconciliation is secondary.
I chose to stand but it is not an eternal choice. I might re evaluate my postion if the situation changes. Currently I have no time limit and I don't anticipate my eventual responses to eventual evolutions. Currently for me, the benefits of standing exceed from far the disadvantages, so it is good for me.
Then there is an additional point. "Wanting to reconcile" is one thing, "having done the work of healing" another one. If my W says to me tomorrow that the wants to reconcile, but she does not want to work on herself and heal her FOO wounds, I don't think I would agree. Currently I am on my journey and my wife is on hers, I am working on myself because I have chosen to do it and because it makes me happy and it improves my relationships with the others, including my own family.
"Wanting to reconcile", imo, is more a matter of consistent actions in time than a matter of words. Actions are more meaningful than words.
M 44, W43. Married 18 years, together 21
3 children D17, D15, S6
OM discovered Dec 22, BD Jan 23 (few days after)
W still living at home
Aimer, c'est donner sans attendre de retour et tout acte est prière, s'il est don de soi (Antoine de Saint Exupéry)
Love means to give without expecting return, and every act is a prayer if it is a self-gift. (thanks OffRoad !)