JohnnyBravo - Thanks for that. I am a visual person and now I can't unsee that - Hahaha. I guess I am just glad UrsaMajor didn't follow up with a GIF illustrating that specific interpretation. LOL
Treasur - My Guest Puppy is way too smart. That method of getting me up was clearly effective and so this morning I accepted that she has appointed herself as my personal Puppy Alarm clock. We had a repeat performance and on a Monday it was fine. I just wish there was a snooze button or a weekend setting if this is going to be the way it is from now on.

forthetrees - In all fairness, I should clarify, it is not a hole for a casket, but cremated remains, which does make a difference on a certain level. The whole thing is still very odd all the way around.
D mentioned to S and I she wondered how long before Xh's siblings are in some sort of feud, as their pattern has been always the same. They get together and play the parts of perfect family every couple of years and then there is some disagreement and they have a falling out and Xh and the BIL (BIL 2) play mediators. S laughed. D is not wrong in that assessment.
For years, I knew Xh felt his job was to try and hold his fractured family together. BIL 2, the one I still speak to always told me that he walked away from the drama. He was close with Xh, but the rest of his siblings, he loved, but best when it was done from afar and that none of them had dealt with the nasty divorce or their FOO issues, so he chose distance for his own sanity. Wise move.
When we would get together with Xh's family it was often one sibling at a time. Those times could be fun and things seemed fairly normal aside from maybe personality differences. Xh got along with all of his siblings and we had some good times. Maybe because it was not all that often that the FOO issues really didn't emerge. Maybe it was because Xh always stayed away from those topics, IDK. The issues came to the surface when on rare occasions they would all or most of them would get together.
When Xh's parents divorced, each kid took their side. It was right down the middle and for 4 of them that hasn't changed. BIL 2 and Xh were the only ones that seemed to realize that was their parent's issue not theirs to solve. And D's assessment is spot on. Every family event there was always someone who was angry with one of the other or multiple siblings and then they would get together, the issue was never really resolved and they would behave like nothing had happened. Then a new feud would erupt. The division would reappear.
One of the last issues I was witness to was my former SIL out of nowhere accused the one B of some horrendous thing. Just announced it to Xh and I out of the blue. No back up story or details, just accusations. It left us both stunned and wondering what was true, considering my SIL always had a knack for telling stories that all 5 of her Bs would look at her with confusion wondering what house she was raised in. They sometimes figured it was perhaps her female perspective, but I grew to realize my SIL had an active imagination and was a drama queen anyways. With this accusation, she never once confronted the "offending" B, just quit talking to him and spread what I believe now were more rumor than reality. So, he distanced himself and tried to talk to her about it to resolve it, I will give him that. But, she would go for 2 or 3 years where if anyone else as much as spoke to him she was angry with them. When she got wind of the remaining siblings getting together as that B was moving across country, she was upset she wasn't invited to wish him safe travels. I remember Xh just being utterly shocked she would want to even see this B if he had done the things she accused him of.
Didn't she show up at the event and walked up to the B she made accusations about and told him how mad she was that he hadn't been in contact with her.

BIL 2 was not able to be there, so he missed that performance. SIL and her Bs all behaved like nothing had ever happened and it was never brought up again. I recall thinking WTF just happened? But then that was the way his family was with everything (except BIL 2, who has done his mirror work, etc over the years). Xh's family were experts in brushing things under the rug. I can confirm based on first hand accounts that hasn't exactly benefited Xh.

When FIL was dying and BIL 2 asked him what his wishes were for burial, he avoided it. He was in hospice by then. Xh asked. Nothing. Then out of the blue FIL mentioned that he wanted to be buried in his hometown - a place he left and never set foot in after he left.
Now, I have no issue with his desires or Xh's and his siblings granting that final wish. There was money left for that venture. But, it is what followed that just made me completely scratch my head. I was not part of that process as by then Xh had flown the coop. I am actually grateful I wasn't there.
Xh started by carving a marble headstone for his F. He drove it to his B's house and picked him up, which was 1,400 miles then they drove back together to where FIL was going to be buried. That meant Xh had to drive back towards his house where he left from which was 1000 miles and then drove his B back the 1000 miles. Xh then drove the entire 1,400 miles back. So, in essence, this trip back and forth racked up nearly 5000 miles. That was the first moment of head scratching for me.
The headstone, being marble will not survive that particular environment. Xh would have known that in his right mind.

They arrived at the hometown and sought out the cemetery caretaker and couldn't find them, so they (not sure which noodle heads in the family thought this was a good idea) decided to pick a spot in this older cemetery, put down the headstone and dug a hole for FIL's ashes.
BIL died a few months later. Xh would drive around with the ashes in his console and that might not have been so bizarre except the kids (he was still communicating with D at that point) would come home and say their F was losing it. They said they would get in his SUV and Xh would right away open the console and tell the kids to say hi to their uncle. While he may have been joking, the kids thought it was less than amusing and odd, considering it was every time they went out.
After driving around with BIL in the console for what seemed like eternity the siblings decided to bury BIL with FIL. They got together, and part of the delay was in fact because they were feuding over FIL's second W and the fact that FIL never changed his will, in spite of my trying to tell him she would get everything. FIL argued with me I was wrong and didn't want to deal with it. Nah- I called that. It was not second W's fault he stuck his head in the sand. She had every right to what was left legally at that point and yet the kids were ticked at her. I recall telling SIL that was all on her F, not the second W.
When they arrived at the cemetery, both of my kids had gone. I wasn't invited and grateful for that, TBH. Both kids came home and said again they just did what they wanted and found the headstone they had left. Xh, his Bs that were in attendance and my SIL all brow beat S and told him he had to dig the hole for the ashes. S came home really traumatized by it all.
What struck me the whole time was what they did was at least in most states that I know - illegal for one. They didn't care. And the whole scenario seems like some twisted movie plot.
It is not that I am opposed to following someone's last wishes. My F's dear friend who used to go duck hunting with my F many years ago wanted to have some of his ashes shot out of a gun over their favorite hunting spot. That is funny and an odd request. But this thing with Xh's family runs deeper. Now, suddenly the remaining siblings, bar BIL 2 who wants no part of this in his words "charade" of happy family, have said they all want to be buried there and each remaining sibling is to go add the name by carving it themselves into the headstone.
Maybe I am missing something. But to me it is just beyond my comprehension. It is not like they are somehow deeply committed to their heritage and this is some deep-seated family tradition or cultural thing. This is something they cooked up on their own.
It would be shortly after that whole thing that one of Xh's sudden MLC ideas was he had approached the new owner of the land where his F grew up. The old "homestead" sits there in essentially ruins and Xh asked the owner if he could buy that small parcel of land and move there. Then he wanted to buy it and dismantle it and move it 1000 miles away to where Xh lives now.
Now, the less jaded part of me says "huh, interesting thought - preserving his heritage". I kind of get that. However, Xh told me countless times he hated his F. That relationship never resolved itself while FIL was alive. Xh didn't go to see him when his B told him FIL was dying. Xh's response was he had seen him a couple of weeks before he was all set. FIL essentially died alone. And that is what strikes me as so odd. They have made this some great memorial to F that none seemed too terribly fond of over the years.
I just don't get it. Maybe I am not forgiving enough. Or maybe it is because I don't whitewash things like that. I believe in people being able to change. I believe in forgiving and forgetting or at least moving past something. But when it is a situation where they change the history and somehow tell the story of a monster when the person is alive and suddenly in death they are some cuddly kitten? IDK - I can't quite read that story and believe it to be anything but a fairytale.