one could just as well make the rational argument that if it is easier for vanishers not to see our pain or the damage, it is because it is hard for them to see it...which means it distresses or bothers them somehow...which means in a weird way it does matter enough that it's easier for them to not do it weird encouraging thought for the day though fwiw
Yes, I get exactly what you are saying. I wrote something similar to that idea maybe about 10 threads back. I'm not sure everyone got what I was saying...lol. Like you said, weird LBS logic.
It's like two different guys runs over their own dog with their car, then quickly replaces dying dog with a puppy.
One guy drives by dying dog daily and pets it to ease his guilt,
the other avoids even driving down that street as it's easier to pretend it never happened.
Does the "petter" love his dying dog more or less than the avoider? Who knows? It wasn't about the feelings before, during or after crushing the dog, it's just about how to ease their own guilt about what they did.
And what about the puppy? Is the puppy better than the faithful dog that was crushed for no reason?
pfft... sure puppies are cute and fun, but all they do is sh!t everywhere and whine all night.