But does that mean you think they shouldn't be made aware of the fact that chances of a successful reconciliation is low?
Good, you asked instead of actually jumping to a false dilemma conclusion.
And I will answer that question.
No, it does not mean that I think that at ALL.
If anything I hope comes through here, it's that I am interested in *accuracy.* And my view of HS is that there is no way in hell that anyone coming here and actually reading things is going to believe that the "chances" are high. Just reading the site is enough to give that awareness.
Again, we don't have absolute concrete facts, but we have a very very good idea of the liklihood based on the numbers computed by Acorn. Don't like those numbers, how how the re-marriage statistics LP used earlier? Or is re-marriage not required for successful recon?
As I said, the computations don't necessarily map the way people may assume they do. More specifically, they don't show the true historical picture of whatever we want to call recon, which as you note is *also* not monolithic in definition. And, we cannot, in any given real situation, use historical measures as a "likelihood" of it having a certain outcome, even if we *had* true past figures.
I...really would like to give some mathematical examples, too, of how sometimes, we apply a perfectly logical measurement tool to something that is not measurable with it. But I'll have to think about that. Or other members might know what I'm getting at there and chime in.
But if you are dedicated to standing, the odds shouldn't matter.
While this is true as stated...I say that not only can we not know the odds, but such a concept actually does not even *apply* if you get down to it.
Sorry folks...this is getting into the philosophical realm and that is one reason I have a hard time posting anything! Aaaaaa!