https://deconstructingstigma.org/latest/language?utm_medium=email&utm_content=421122525&utm_source=hs_emailCame across this while researching something for a project and it may not resonate but I found the topic interesting - in terms of "what's the whole story, really?"/labels don't account for individual circumstances - and it got me thinking about the ways people sometimes use terminology about themselves or others. Sometimes, unintentionally, we stop actually seeing ourselves or others clearly precisely because we think we see them clearly - I know that sounds daft. But I think our certainty about who a person is can become a blindness, and we've probably all done it - particularly in long marriages, we may get complacent and just create an emotional file: my spouse is this or that kind of person - as if people are 2D rather than humans with psychological depth that contain sides we just haven't yet seen...or haven't looked at, or haven't wanted to really see, which is a subtle difference. Reality is both objective and subjective, and sometimes to avoid discomfort, subjective (our interpretation) can take over in a way that blurs, like an emotional astigmatism.
I think there's a risk sometimes that labels can unintentionally freeze a moment in time, if that makes sense. What we say about ourselves too - what might have been true at one time is not the whole story: "I am this thing" is different from "I'm experiencing this (present tense)" is different from "This is a pattern I'm actively working on (not passively waiting out)" is different from "I experienced something (past tense)"...
https://youtu.be/X2iHXlCShmY?si=8G3wfBY2tVkK92cj
The desire to be loved is the last illusion. Give it up and you shall be free. ~ Margaret Atwood
You think *your* pain and *your* heartbreak are unprecedented in the history of the world, but then you read. ~ James Baldwin
If it comes back it was either meant to be…or it’s a cockroach 😈