I'm glad this has stirred up so much interest.
Having read everything I could in my searching phase, I came out believing in a phenomenon that we can call MLC, but I don't think the cause is the same for everyone, or that everyone experiences it the same way.
So it's not a phenomenon, but phenomena?
I do think that there are so many common psychological indicators in MLCers that you can see predictive factors, certain FOO issues, narcissistic tendencies, intimacy avoidance...
I have no doubt that maladative behaviours can lead to crises, when these no longer work. But these seem to be different problems, with different types of crisis, even though we can see similarities with some.
But I don't believe there is any real evidence of a "process" or that everyone gets through the tunnel or fog. But that's just me. I know too many men who have been stuck in MLC lala land for a LONG time to believe they are processing anything in any timeframe--they will die of an STD or a DUI accident before they defog... But anyway, I just wanted to throw some alternate perspectives out there... Lisa
Love alternative perspectives... I agree, the processes are tendencies.
Quote from: Trustandlove on September 23, 2011, 19:42:56
If you don't believe that MLC is a process, linear or otherwise, can that hinder the acceptance that is necessary to get through this?
Our actions have consequences, of course. We can make things worse by our behaviour and attitudes. It helps if we have insight. But I don't think MLC is a process, I think that it's an existential crisis that can evolve, and even be resolved. We can only deal with ourselves, and this is where the positive attitudes of this forum are so helpful.
Other researchers say there is no evidence for MLC at all: see http://www.apa.org/monitor/apr03/researchers.aspx
.If you look at the research, evidence for a midlife crisis is just not there," says Margaret H. Huyck, PhD, a professor at the Illinois Institute of Technology's Institute of Psychology in Chicago. "Some men are vulnerable, but not all of them. You have to understand the specific conditions that make particular men vulnerable." (This is from the link above).
Isn't this a bit of an oxymoron?
You're right, the way she's put it is contradictory.
The thing is, is it about age? Is it to do with midlife? Or something else?
My argument is that there is no doubt whatsoever that our spouses are in
crisis. Many of them have childhood issues, (but not all); some of them have problems with aging, or their sexuality; some of them have more serious issues, and may have developed a real psychosis (not the temporary blindness to reality that many have while in defence.mode).
In the case of psychosis, or violence, I personally would not stand.