Yes, history is a part of it; I'd never deny that. An important part. And the future as well -- splitting the family affects everyone's future.
But in the end my stand for my marriage is also because of who he was, who I know he can be. He was never horrible, indeed, he was sweet and kind.
Perfect? No, not at all. He had his insecurities, I thought that was what made him human.
A counsellor asked me a long time ago if I missed the man or the relationship -- he was saying that a relationship could easily be replaced. I don't quite agree with that, but that's besides the point.
For me, in the end, it is about the man, I married him, not just "a husband".
And that doesn't mean I sit on the doormat, saying "stamp on me...: