Been reading a bit today, stayed thread and the victim triangle etc and it got me to thinking a lot about the enabling side of things.
I so recognise the triangle in my previous marriage to h I was the rescuer for sure, then I would feel very put upon and become the persecutor, whilst h remained predominantly in the victim mode, only peeking out to persecutor in the passive aggressive fashion.
I also believe he fully resented me spending very little time in the victim and always looking down. I get it.
As far as the enabling goes boy did I do it huge, massive time.
I enabled my h to take no responsibility for anything including himself. I enabled his passive aggressiveness and took many blames that we're not mine to take. I took all responsibility for finances, the house the children. I allowed all of that, that is entirely my fault.
We have only bought two houses and I arranged everything from finance to insurances to solicitors, to utilities to tv packages you name it I arranged it and took care of it. I did it all, he did nothing. When h said he wanted to do up a house he said it once and never mentioned it again until after BD when he blamed me for not helping him get his dream. He wanted me to do it for him and I never, I did not enable and he was angry.
So enabler, control freak, just a responsible person I don't know what I was. But I do know now that I would not do all that again, except for myself that is.
I take no responsibility for his not growing up, that's his problem but I definitely allowed him not to take responsibility for the big stuff in life that grown ups do. I did all the house buying stuff at age 22 and it was scary. I also think this is why he stayed home this whole time and hated the rental, he couldn't handle all the responsibility at came with it. He didn't have mamma SD doing everything for him.
Mt nAme is SD and I was an enabler. I am in 12 step :-))
SD
Relax - they have a Karma bus ticket to ride.