Everyone's perspective is so fascinating and informative. UM indicates that trust and expectations are the same, yet for me expectations means someone said they could do it, so I will see if they meet that (no trust) and trust means I already BELIEVE they have the ability to do what I asked. And for me, I can't believe in anyone's ability to do something, personal, business or otherwise, until we have had some interaction. And to me, any interaction with someone I don't know well is being vulnerable because I open myself to disappointment. Trust, for me, means I BELIEVE this person and take them at their word, and I do not do that with any random individual. And I already know I don't hire people to do a job like most people do. It's not just a business transaction to me. I can trust someone will choose to be a bozo, too. I definitely believe trust and vulnerability are cyclical.
SS, imo, we are all mutants or we'd be clones (send in the clones?). You just have a different perspective. I still saw vulnerability first, the willingness to take a risk at trying to understand your colleague, and a trust in yourself to handle whatever happened. You see it differently and it's likely a semantics, experience or perspective thing.
I completely relate to all of you who fringed the various groups in your life. I was always what I called a fringer. I had so many interests, I never fit squarely with any one group, though I had my four core school friends and my 8 core home friends. (Those never crossed over, I'm not sure why). It is my belief that most of the people who end up here are thinkers, introspective, definitely not the surface level people. If we were, it would be easy to just trot along to the next relationship.
There are a lot of good people out there (here we all are!). Trust and vulnerability are important, but I'm beginning to think patience is the key.