I have to say, I do not understand people who do not want an apology for having been treated poorly. Why do I feel this way? Because while I completely understand a position of "The apology means nothing". I have to disagree with that. It may mean
nothing to them, but it might mean something to the person apologizing. ...
I still want to believe that even if I never wanted to have anything to do with my MLCer again, I'd want him to not be screwed up. For the sake of the kids if nothing else. I don't want anyone to be screwed up. So even a half way apology would tell me they feel at least a narcissistic compulsion to behave like a normal human being. That is better than not caring at all, IMO.
I'm wondering what not wanting/need a verbal apology as to do with not wanting the MLCer to be well. I want Mr J, and all MLCers, to be well. I don't need a I'm sorry. At this point it is irrelevant. Let alone if it is all I will get.
As for his possible need of apologizing, well, he can e-mail me. Or call me. But if his need, as has happened several times in the past, is reduced to "I'm sorry, it is all my fault", thanks, but not thanks. Actions firts, please.
Long ago, early 2008, Mr J wanted to come by and apologize in person for all he had done. By then he had already done quite a lot, but not as much as he has been doing since - there had be no courts cases, for example.
I end up saying no, don't come. Saying you're sorry while you carry on doing the same stuff, makes no sense. He agreed it didn't.
I'm certain saying "I'm sorry" is not that hard for Mr J. I have heard it many times in the past. What is very, very hard for him is to change, to do what has to be done in actions. "I'm sorry" is too easy for him and what he thinks is enough. All he thinks it takes, in fact.
I want his apology to show his accountabilty and acceptance of what he has done to hurt me and all it needs be is " I'm sorry that I hurt you" then his actions would have genuine substance.
I want all the money I'm owned, my belongings, monster to go away and be treated with respect. For me it is irrelevant if Mr J's actions have, or don't have real substance. I just want what is mine.
You guys need to understad it has been 13 years since Mr J left, what type of MLCer he has been and what type of person I am.
This is such an interesting thread bc it is validating that, just as our situations are different, we interpret these terms differently and need different things don't we? Which is entirely ok.
Yes, since our situations are different, we are different, out time since BD is different, we need different things. It is OK.
Where I can see a potential problem between LBS and MLCer is when the LBS needs one thing (ot things), but the MLCer is not able to do it. Like with Barbie and Song that a need a verbal "I'm sorry I hurt you", but their husband don't seem to be capable of.
It has always seemed to me that one of the biggest markers of a 'cooked' MLCer is about the Me Me Me factor. If they can't or won't do any of the 4As or understand why you need them, it is just more Me Me Me imho.
Indeed.
.. .but if an MLCer won't challenge their emotional comfort zone to do any of these 4As, why should they (or others, or us) expect or assume that we will continue to challenge our own emotional comfort zone to pay those costs? And often without even that being acknowledged or apparently appreciated.
Good question. I don't think we should continue to challange/spend/waste our emotional comfort zone to pay such costs. It is a too great emotional, even physical, cost to deal with Mr J in any way. Let alone think of reconciling with him. I don't need that.
Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together. (Marilyn Monroe)