The subject of FOO issues comes up a lot on this forum; we're all looking for reasons for this MLC...
I just wrote her background for information; I wasn't intending to say "this is what caused it". In my own case, it's me rather than my MLC H who has the messed-up FOO, by that reckoning it's me who should be having the crisis.
What she didn't talk about at all was her H, except in passing. In was as if she didn't consider him part of this at all. That would chime with my own experience, and with a lot of what is written here -- with what DGU says, that his W said she had to do this herself.
I didn't ask her outright if she realised how much she was hurting him, I may do that next time. Her take is that "they" struggled for a long time, and the separation was better, as there was no longer the toxic atmosphere at home. The few times she mentioned him was to say that she didn't think he was being firm enough with their daughters.
I had heard the other side to that a couple of years ago, that his eldest D said that he didn't seem like her father any more -- not that he was behaving like the MLCer, but that he was no longer the strong force that he had been. My own take is that he was so at sea himself that he couldn't be. And as he had been forced to move out, didn't see his daughters daily, he could no longer have that say in their daily lives. And his W did make him move out. He spent a long, long time appeasing her, doing everything she wanted, so he agreed to leave as well. (clearly he hasn't read the advice about not doing so here....).
Now my friend of course interpreted it as him not being firm, not being a strong enough father, not enforcing rules enough, and so on. How he feels just doesn't enter in to it for her -- so much so that I didn't even ask if she thought about how he felt. I have a feeling that if I had, she'd just say that he couldn't go on, either.
I did ask her last year sometime why she made him go; she fed me a story. (justifying herself...). She also said that she felt the girls needed her, as their mother, for the female influence. That they needed their father all the time as well didn't enter into it for her; she thought that as long as they saw him it didn't really matter. She justified it by saying that it was better for them that there wasn't the bad atmosphere at home. She continues to say that. I DID challenge that; she didn't like that.
As to what she's been doing:
This is the yucky part; this is the part that the LBS has the hardest time with.
She didn't have OM when she left, but she definitely planned to find one. I remember her telling me 2 years ago that she'd "be a lot happier if she had a boyfriend".
Well, she's had one, but seems to have broken up with him now. I didn't ask how long he had been around; my guess is since sometime last year. I had already heard through someone else that her daughters had thought he was awful; she says that she felt such love for him like she'd never felt before, that she couldn't accept less than that. This is, of course, infatuation -- I did point that out. She said yes, of course, but there was so much more.... she gave heart and soul to him, she said.
She finished it because he was so very jealous, she said. She said it was interesting to feel that kind of deep love, yet realise that she couldn't stay with him. All in all no sense at all.... so very MLC.
She wants to find someone else.
I know that is hard for the LBS here to read; I'm not trying to say that she has made a final decision, what I really saw was someone deep in it. She has a lot that is 'under control'; she functions well at work, she does deal with a lot of her daughters' things, and so on, but in herself, she still hasn't a clue. She is experimenting.
She said she was learning about herself, about her wild side, which was a revelation. Now I didn't know her before she met her H, but I've heard that she had a wild side then. So this would tally with what so many MLCers do -- go back to that.
More later...