The whole idea of MLC has been around for a long time, and since 1965 Jung has been talked about and discussed. It was described as a concept in 1965 by Jaques, and has been in popular fiction ever since (songs, film and pop-psychology). Erikson included MLC in his theory of personality development.
Psychologists are no different to any other mainstream scientists/doctors. They stick with what they know and with what is written in their DMV manual. MLC is not a condition found in the DMV manual and so it is not part of their bag of diagnostic tools. It’s that simple - as a person who has spent her life in scientific methodology it takes a very unique scientist to break the mould and think outside the box. Most scientists/doctors are limited by their training.
My psychotherapist and psychologist friends are familiar with Erikson, Jung and others. They have years of clinical experience, and as intelligent, reflective practitioners, and not "trained" but "educated" to look for evidence and solutions. Scientific methodology doesn't mean think inside the box, but looking for supporting evidence, rather than relying on hearsay and folk wisdom.
The problem is that MLC is NOT a single identifiable mental disease. We talk about it as if it is, but it is not. We look for signs and similarities between our spouses, and explain away the differences, but these collections of behaviours are not the same thing at all. There has been research about the verifiability of MLC, and the result is that there isn't enough evidence for it.
There are spouses here whose behaviour suggests personality disorder, or even psychosis. Sometimes this behaviour has been going on for years and reaches a crisis point because of the unstable nature of the disorders. On the other hand, some psychotic behaviour may be triggered by drink/ drugs, neurological disorders, internal or external events, including severe stress.
- There are cases in which the spouse is inherently unstable, despite having outwardly shown stability for some time.
- There are cases in which the spouse has been married for years, others who have only been married for a short time.
- There are cases in which the spouse has apparently been happily married, and then appear to change suddenly, others in which there has been a build up for some time.
- There are cases in which the spouse is young, or old, so the crisis is not about midlife at all.
- There are some in which the spouse is depressed, outwardly or covertly, others who are not.
- There are major differences, in behaviour and in outcome.
This doesn't mean we are imagining anything; as we all know only too well, us LBS face real problems and shocks. It doesn't mean that this website is invalid. It gives us useful tools to defend/ rebuild ourselves, a community of support, and a way of explaining things so they make sense to us. But when we talk about stages, tunnels, liminality, etc, we are using metaphors which help us to navigate our social world.
Of course, there are many ways that a therapist can help an individual deal with this, and individual values come into this. Some would not encourage a LBS to stand for their marriage when it is abusive and counterproductive to individual growth. Mine encouraged me to face the different possible outcomes, and to focus on
myself rather than explaining away my H's aberrant behaviour. A pretty wise approach, I think.
At the end of the day, if you are looking for a therapist who will just go along with what you believe, why get a therapist? On the other hand, if you truly don't gel with your therapist and trust them, it's time to get a new therapist.
BTW, we discussed MLC sometime ago, here:
http://mlcforum.theherosspouse.com/index.php?topic=191.msg4948#msg4948Personality disorders here:
http://mlcforum.theherosspouse.com/index.php?topic=2209.msg130015#msg130015An article about one type of crisis:
http://mlcforum.theherosspouse.com/index.php?topic=4.msg17890#msg17890