Okay, I am really getting out there I know (hell, I am the only one up here...still drinking my coffee), but here is something that REALLY bothers me in modern society:
In hindsight, I should have chosen to marry someone in the same economic class as myself: Why-because I was a "have", and my wife was a "have not". I do NOT discount the contributions she brought to the m, but based on our current d laws, I am going to lose WAY more than she will. At least if my w was of the same economic level as me, then splitting assets would yield the same financial fallout as if I was single. As it turns out, I am going to be WAY worse off than if I was single, and she is going to benefit way MORE than if she was single.
Don't get me wrong, I did NOT have the attitude that marriage was all about finances; obviously I married because of what I felt in my heart; but now I question everything.
-T
-EDIT- Not sure if that came out the right way. Let me put it like this: She contributed 25% or less to our household income. I contributed the remaining 75% or greater; and for the women working, yes...I know there is more to it than money, but why is it that she will walk away with 50% of the assets? ESPECIALLY considering she was "done", and I wasn't at the time?