To clarify a few things:
First, On the quote about low value women, I feel equally about men. There are men and women who I would not want a relationship with. Didn't feel it was needed at the time I made that reference to clarify its not a gender thing.
Secondly I explicitly excluded religious views at the top. In my view sin is sin (adultery or prostitution) and does corrosive damage to the sinner but sin is morally worse when it hurts others.
Third, I agree with RCR that the optimal way to stand involves no third parties but several responders to this thread of conversation are, in their personal threads discussing loneliness and seeking romantic companionship.
My motivations behind this topic was to examine that point in a stand where youbstartbgoing wobbly. It is an intellectual interest. I'm not personally at that point right now but I have come close to dating several times.
In her response, RCR clearly indicating a heirarchy, consistent with everyone else. Another consenting woman is bad but paying for sex is worse. It's that hierarchy I am intrigued by.
Someone said that in a reconciliation point a pro would be harder to explain than an emotional entanglement--a true affair. I strongly disagree with the realities of that statement. In fact I would argue that most would explain it away by equating it- it was just sex--I was lonely.
Ultimately RCR its your site and if a topic is verboten we can drop it.