Fist off, allow me a correction. It was not Acorn that maintaining dignity is all the necesarry Paving The Way. It was Nas. Acorn quoted Nas.
Speaking for myself, I don't think forgiveness is overrated. Forgiveness is for us. I find that forgiving lifted a weight. Forgiving does not equal wanting to reconnect or reconcile. I also always said that it is probably easy for forgive when the MLCer is not back than when they are.
I see though that people believe that they are "right" and that anyone who doesn't agree with them is "wrong."
Funny, I see the same from those who don't like the truth, that few will reconcile. Even if all facts and evidences say that few will reconcile there are people that, for some reason, seem to want to hide the head in the sand. I am speaking in general terms.
It is condescending and hurtful to those with different beliefs and values and shuts down any respectful dialogue or debate.
That could be said for those of us who do not see the use of Paving The Way and that are not Standing. Even if many, including long time LBS have long been in new relationships or marriages and long time standers are rare, those who are not standing often taken a beat. A huge beat.
Rage? No rage from me. I just find it illogical. If one is Paving The Way, as the expression itself implies, one is doing it towards something or someone. And that is contray to detach and let it go. Since we know most will never reconcile the way Paving The Way is written and the purpose of its use only serves a handful of LBS.
You may be confussion having an opinion with being enraged.
Even standing implies an outcome. One is standing for something or someone. HS has many contradictory terms and ideas. Yet, once again, standing is at odds with letting it go and no expectations. If one is standing one has an expectation.
Confusing, right?
I see a line being drawn between being empathetic and being a pretzeled doormat.
Agree.
Doormat is used by RCR in the articles. It is easy to understand and accurate. Some LBS are doormats. They allow the MLCer to walk all over them, bow to the MLCers regardless of what he/she does, keep in contact with their married MLCer, have no boundaries, etc.
Emphatically stating that it is very rare for MLCers to return home, even though I will agree that to be true and is perhaps wise for people who are not committed to standing to hear....but for those of us who continue to stand it feels harsh and tends to make me feel like I am a doormat for choosing how I treat my spouse...which is not what most HS posters would agree is "right" and which is why I don't post any updates of what has and is happening in our relationship.
It is not harsh. It is a fact. You yourself agree with the fact. RCR is fully aware of the fact. RCR have also always said that the longer the crisis the lower the chances of reconciliation.
I don't think you have to worry. You will reconcile. I don't see you as a doormat. You have a nice, very mild MLCer that has never been abusive nor left you in financial dire straits. He is also not married to his alienator.
I see no reason for sugar coating the truth. RCR is quite brutal in several of her articles as well as in her posts. Maybe people forgot what is in several of the articles? HB is often equally brutal in her articles.
I'm with Ready2. I don't think you were "lucky". You knew your MLCer/which type he was. I would most certainly had reconciled if my MLCer was like yours. He isn't. He and many MLCers are not like yours. And that is where I think, at times, you "fail". You have no first hand experience with many sides of MLC. Sides that are far more complex than the ones who dealt with.
Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together. (Marilyn Monroe)