Ok....now for something that is actually "script" related!
So, most of us have heard the "I love you, but I am not in love with you" speech in one form or another! But what does that really mean? OK, so we say "in love" is all about infatuation & excitement & it doesn't last. Love grows into a deeper connection & bond. Yep, I'll agree with that!
However, I've been reading a book lately that discusses this topic and has a different outlook on this script. Now, this may be out of context somewhat of MLC and more in the domain of a true "WAS", but I'll offer it here for discussion!
So, let's break down the two key words / phrases here:
Love = the loving, caring, connection type actions which gives comfort and bonding in the relationship = actions that release Oxytocin. For us guys, this would be the "beta" traits!
In Love = Fun, exciting, charismatic, charming type actions which are attractive = actions that release dopamine. For us guys, this would be the "alpha" traits!
So, replace the key words in that statement and you get:
"I "oxytocin" you, but I'm not in "dopamine" with you". In other words, the loving bond is still there, but you don't excite me or attract me anymore. This explains the waffling between the LBS & the OP; they still have the bond with the LBS, but they are getting the dopamine rush from the OP.
I would say this is probably at work somewhat in the clingers and boomerangs! Just a theory!
***Point of view alert***: I never completely agreed with the idea that we "choose" to love someone. I think we choose whether or not to pursue a long term relationship, but there has to be an attraction to begin with; some "chemistry" to coin a phrase. I mean, you can't just see someone on the street and decide "hey, I choose to love you, so let's get after it!" There has to be attraction / hormones at work in the first place!
DO