Wait, your wife proposed some level of reconciliation without sex and you turned that down? Reconciliation in my eyes should start out with no sex. I wouldn't have my H come knocking back at my door and have sex with him. I would feel like he came back just for that and my trust of him would not be anywhere near having sex with him. Reconciliation is a long process where sex is far far away in the future. It is an essential element of a relationship and should not be one of the first things added back into reconciliation. The MLC may not be anywhere near ready to move in that direction nor the LBS. This needs to be a work in progress.
Well said, UL, I agree completely.
She specifically recommended an Asian massage of ill repute. That was again the response this February on Valentine's weekend.
This definitely sounds like MLC "logic".
So what you're saying is, I was right, this is MLC logic if it was suggested by your wife. And even though it was suggested by her, if you follow through with it I doubt it will have a positive effect on your relationship.
My wife gave the the "You're a good man, you shouldn't wait for me" speech. I have her permission to move on. The divorce she initiated may even be her way to make it easier for me to move on. But how does my moving on make it easier for us to reconcile. All it would do, in my opinion, is confirm her belief that I don't really love her, something that I suspect she already hears regularly from her OM. And wouldn't he love to be able to use my moving on or even visiting an escort as proof that he was right. Well I'm not going to give it to him.