If you're reading this, you might want to get a coffee first. Didn't do so well on "short"...
In regards to the discussion, I think HS is an inclusive forum, and is the richer for it. At least, I find the diversity of views and experience enriching.
And I do think that where one self-identifies on the continuum of standing and not-standing or uncertain or shifting or anywhere in between does frame participation in the board.
This says it well:
Fact--true standers and non-standers have very different views of the world and MLC.
So what are some of the ways that the views are different? Well, all standers are not all alike, those who have dropped their stand are not all alike, and those inbetween are not alike. So how to frame some of the differences as differing but valuable world views – that we can all appreciate, learn from, and respect -- rather than labels?
In my
experience as a stander, (and this is me, not all standers, but I suspect there is some shared experience) I have worked hard to get to the point where I plan my life as if H is never coming back, but I live my life like he is.
Before anyone tells me to let him go, and how I need to live like he isn’t coming back, let me explain what I mean.
Some facts, for those who do not know. BD was almost 2 years ago; H left soon after. We do not have a legal separation agreement, still have some joint back accounts, have sold our house, own another property together, and shared assets like vehicles. We went through mediation, but never finalized an agreement. There is no legal action at this time. There is some contact every few weeks, none of it emotionally connecting, and for the most part I now leave contact to him except for what is necessary on administrative things. None of this is what I wanted, so I am in the position of responding as best I can to take care of me as a result of a unilateral choice he has made. I believe there are multiple EAs,; no PA that I know of.
Planning my life like he isn’t coming back means I have zero expectation my life will involve H. I have shifted things like insurance so there is less life insurance, and more disability or critical illness (we don’t have children, so the insurance I have needs to take care of me). I have had to reconfigure my retirement expectations. I plan vacations, hobbies, family gatherings, time with friends work, retirement, everything from the standpoint of what do
I need to do. So, basically, from the question of ‘what does my life going forward look like now?’.
I leave the shared stuff alone, including the joint account with the proceeds from the house sale because I
choose not to trigger legal action. It’s
not because I’m in denial. It’s because he’s been good with the money, I’ve been good with the money and leaving it alone as it signals a huge amount of trust on both our parts. Risky? Sure. Trusting? Sure. And right now the markets are doing poorly, so at least we’re not losing anything.
From the ‘living like he
is coming back’ standpoint, it’s simple.
I don’t date.
I don’t look for other men. A, because I’m not ready, B, because I’m married.
I won’t initiate a legal process. A. because right now, I don’t want to B. I don’t have to.
And that’s it. For me, it’s that simple
Am I afraid?
Heck no, I’m not afraid and quite frankly, I resent the implication.
And I really disagree with this world view:
But standers fear moving on more than non-standers fear standing. And non-standers forget that they are talking to people who do not want to face that they or their spouse might be coD, narcs, subclinical PD, depressed, etc.
How can anyone even know who fears what more?
Have I been angry? Darn right. I got over that pretty quickly.
Does my H have issues? Sure
Do I have mirror work to do? Sure
You can talk divorce to me all you want to. I’m not afraid of it. I know the legal aspects in my jurisdiction very, very well. Frankly, divorce would make my life a lot easier.
But, as I’ve said before, that’s not why I come here. I come here because I don't want a divorce.
I came here because it’s a place where people “get it”, where despite all of the painful things an MLC spouse does, there is some understanding that an LBS can still love and forgive them. I come here because it’s ostensibly a place where I won’t be shamed or labeled as these things:
For everyone else, standing calls for a whole heap of denial, or cognitive dissonance at the least. True standing means you have to blameshift all the horrible things your spouse has done onto the dis-ease of MLC, watch them treat the OP like gold, throw their kids under the bus, and all the other BS and keep shining that light. Taking back a half-baked MLCer who is not ready to accept blame for all the hurt and devastation they have caused is pretty much a requirement for R—that takes a certain kind of person, and SOME of those people ARE weak. They stand because they are too lazy, afraid, negative, insecure, or a whole host of other things, to look for anything else. I am NOT saying ALL, but they exist and some are here.
I think I’m pretty healthy. I've dug down and done the work. For two years, I’ve been quietly going about doing what I need to be doing without demonizing my H, and without harming myself. Right now, I’m working hard at recalling happy memories. Because as hard as it’s been so far, I have reason to believe it’s going to get harder. And that’s OK. Because I am not afraid.
Now, as for my
perceptions of non-standers. (And this is only my perception, and it’s a perception because its not my experience.).
I think non-standers go through a door that those standing haven't, won't, or don't. And that changes one's thinking. How could it not? It shifts the shared field of experience to a different place. Not better, not worse, not bitter, just different.
It's visible when people say things like "if I had it to do over again, I would do this". Except the "this" is based on what is known now. It's impossible, really, to know. Memory is one thing, a crystal ball is another. So non-standers look at MLC from what '
has' happened, standers are still looking at what '
could' happen.
Yes, I do think when people drop their stand, they
Once you stand down, you see everything in a new way. When the anger takes over and you face the true pain of betrayal and begin to heal--you can never go back.
But I vehemently disagree that only the non-standers feel anger and begin to heal. That’s a shared experience.
So my perception is that non-standers close a door, and confirm that the choice to close it is correct.
Just as standers leave a door open, and choose to confirm that it is correct.
And it is in that need to confirm the “side” of the outcome that I sometimes think the collective “we” run into trouble.
Finally, there are those elsewhere and everywhere in between on the continuum who don’t feel the need to be labeled one way or the other and for them I am truly grateful because they help me believe that no matter what happens, it is going to be OK.
And I sure don’t think colour-coding or more labels is the answer to anything.
If the board is in need of anything, it is in what we share, not how we differ.
No matter what the experience, or where we are in our journeys, there is pain in every keyboard.