I will try again to clarify. Laws are not moral absolutes, slavery is wrong, it didn't just become wrong when it became illegal. Church doctrine defines morality for members, and members may consider it a moral absolute, but reasonable people disagree and various religions disagree. I'm not talking about a religion in particular, I'm saying to actually believe something is absolutely bad, say intentionally hurting a baby, then you must accept that some things are intrinsically evil. If an action is always bad, like intentionally hurting a bady, then you ascribe to a religious belief. You basically believe that some "bad" or "evil" are more than opinions, you accept that they are real. This is the universal law Elegance is referring to. The reality is an atheist may respect and agree with a "universal law", but an atheist can't claim a "universal law" to be an absolute truth and remain consistent with their professed belief system. Basically no god means good and evil are ideas not absolute truths. I know this is deep, but honestly I have never heard an atheist effectively explain how absolute truth can exist w/o god.