1
Our Community / I Had a Midlife Crisis
« Latest by Nas on Today at 11:02:37 AM »I’ve been hesitant to join this conversation because for some reason this particular one is eliciting something in me. I’ll have to contemplate that more, but that’s for me to deal with. I feel confident in speaking on the subject of healing from long term abuse that fits the description of “narcissistic abuse,” but with the caveat that even with consensus among professionals about therapeutic techniques for healing, healing is an individual journey. That said, I know some people want this thread to be a Q&A with a former MLCer so I will just state my thoughts and then step back from this point forward.
I just want to say that mistreatment is mistreatment and abuse is abuse. It doesn’t matter what you call the person who mistreated or abused you, what matters is healing yourself from it. As a matter of fact, focusing on trying to figure out what is exactly wrong with the people who abused me would be a way for me to focus on them and avoid the emotionally difficult process of healing, which includes a deep and honest look at many things about myself, including what brought me to my relationship/marriage in the first place and my own feelings, behaviors and choices throughout it and after it, and my reaction to both that it ended and the way that it ended.
Even my therapist is hesitant to give a definitive name to my mother or my husband’s or anyone else’s treatment of me. Because she doesn’t know them and because naming it with a diagnostic label would not erase or change anything for me. Reverse engineering myself has been a long and exhausting and brutal experience but it takes precedence over armchair or even clinical diagnosis of my former husband or my mother or anyone else. My healing renders a label moot because in healing, I know that I won’t accept it ever again, no matter what it’s called.
I totally understand that giving it a name helps one begin to understand that this is not about us and being abused or discarded (or both) is not an indictment of who we are or our worth. And that is an important step, but that to me, jmho, is where the benefit of giving it a name ends. I personally fail to see how it makes any difference in the LBS healing process whether it is *MLC or NPD (or anything else). IMO, to say otherwise (as the original post does) hints to the idea that there are things you can do to influence or change the outcome, or that because it’s MLC and not a DSM-recognized personality disorder, it will one day come to a near-spontaneous end without requiring psychological intervention or any significant effort on the part of the afflicted spouse.
I just wanted to add my thoughts. I’ve been tempted to start a discussion thread asking what does “doing the work” *really* mean to folks - for the MLCer and for the LBS, how is it the same and how does it differ, etc.
I just want to say that mistreatment is mistreatment and abuse is abuse. It doesn’t matter what you call the person who mistreated or abused you, what matters is healing yourself from it. As a matter of fact, focusing on trying to figure out what is exactly wrong with the people who abused me would be a way for me to focus on them and avoid the emotionally difficult process of healing, which includes a deep and honest look at many things about myself, including what brought me to my relationship/marriage in the first place and my own feelings, behaviors and choices throughout it and after it, and my reaction to both that it ended and the way that it ended.
Even my therapist is hesitant to give a definitive name to my mother or my husband’s or anyone else’s treatment of me. Because she doesn’t know them and because naming it with a diagnostic label would not erase or change anything for me. Reverse engineering myself has been a long and exhausting and brutal experience but it takes precedence over armchair or even clinical diagnosis of my former husband or my mother or anyone else. My healing renders a label moot because in healing, I know that I won’t accept it ever again, no matter what it’s called.
I totally understand that giving it a name helps one begin to understand that this is not about us and being abused or discarded (or both) is not an indictment of who we are or our worth. And that is an important step, but that to me, jmho, is where the benefit of giving it a name ends. I personally fail to see how it makes any difference in the LBS healing process whether it is *MLC or NPD (or anything else). IMO, to say otherwise (as the original post does) hints to the idea that there are things you can do to influence or change the outcome, or that because it’s MLC and not a DSM-recognized personality disorder, it will one day come to a near-spontaneous end without requiring psychological intervention or any significant effort on the part of the afflicted spouse.
I just wanted to add my thoughts. I’ve been tempted to start a discussion thread asking what does “doing the work” *really* mean to folks - for the MLCer and for the LBS, how is it the same and how does it differ, etc.