But your question was how do you respond to naysayers. Well, I'd argue that in your case, those naysayers are probably really confused. You're seething with anger and spewing nasty statements about people paying in the afterlife and wanting people to die in fires, and yet you're standing for your marriage. I think any clear thinking person would see the rigid dichotomy between your searing hatred and your hope for a restored marriage and be utterly perplexed.
And as one last thought, you said:
Your stand can't even be based solely on the fact that you share a son.
I beg to differ......
I Stand for our family unit that he is trying so desperately to demolish. And bringing home some lowlife slime ball is only aiding and abetting in doing just that.
See, neither he, nor she, gets a free pass from me, Standing-Not Standing-whatever.
But hey, I didn't call her a prostitute, either!
a) I stood for quite some time and many others are standing who don't have any children. I completely respect wanting children to have a solid family unit. I completely respect wanting the LBchildren to learn lessons in patience and compassion and the unconditionals.
So I'll say again, your son is watching. And hearing. Your anger, your sarcasm, your insults...they are all born of hurt, and we ALL get that. But if you don't get a handle on it, it's only going to hurt you more. Your MLCer and the OW right now don't care and it's not hurting them. It's hurting you.
b) actually, you called her a prostitute on Ready's thread. And heck, I don't really care, you can call her whatever you darn well please. But she didn't act alone, she didn't hold a gun to his head, and the advice to read the article on misdirected anger at the OW is good and you'd benefit from taking it.
The anger is warranted. It's a stage that we all have to go through, but if you get stuck there, no one benefits, least of all you.
So in summary, here's my response to the actual question you posed in this discussion thread - and it's pretty circular: You don't have to tell anyone you're standing. It's your choice. But if you do and you come across naysayers, they are likely to be confused as to why you are saying you're standing for something that clearly has you so enraged and disgusted.
Which brings us right back to getting a handle on the anger.
^^^^^^
What Nas said.
Exactly this.
(BTW, you did say you sent a text to your S -- while he was at Thanksgiving dinner - saying "I hope you aren't hanging out with prostitutes". So to coyly claim you haven't called OW that is a little self-delusional. And falsely accuses her. While you covet her time with the xH and the ILs you don't honour. While making Standing into an idol.
But I digress.
And need to reel in my own gift for biting remarks.
Just goes to show I need to keep looking in the mirror too. Sigh.)
ANYway, MGG, you did ask what covenant keepers to about the naysayers. I agree with Nas.
I don't call myself a covenant-keeper per se, but I do live as one.
It's been 4.5 years since BD and departure.
Legally (and emotionally) I am still married, so ....I live like a married person. It's as simple as that.
And I tell others........nothing.
Other people don't bring it up because nobody cares. They assume all is done.
If I ever have a discussion with someone, they might find my choice an odd curiosity. But they respect it.
Every now and then members of his family, or mine, or friends, will ask 'Are you divorced (yet)?'
And I say no. End of story.
They might ask if I am dating.
I say "No, not while I'm married".
They might look at me funny. And then we change the subject.
They assume I am an adult, and can make my own decisions. Period.
I don't have to address a lot of naysayers because this is simply a choice I've made for how I will be in the world. It's my choice, and no-one else's concern.
I don't wear it like a badge of honour.
And I don't take it on as a crusade, either.
The only people I talk about H with anymore are LBS friends. And I don't really have to tell them anything because they already get it.