Shocks sis, and all, I have reported at least one antagonistic post from this thread. My question is for both you and also Anjae, NYM, and anyone else (former or recovering MLCer or otherwise) who has a bone to pick with the dynamics in the dialogue here.
For those with a bone to pick, former or recovering MLCer or otherwise:
I don’t like the dogpile that happens here and it’s not limited to Shocks sis or her MLC facts or offering. I don’t like dogpile dynamics on *any* person’s thread or story, *anywhere*. It’s not what I came to HS for, and I find it messy and not fruitful. So I *would* like answers from Anjae and NYM, as to their own MLCs. But to be honest I’d like to see those on your own threads.
Everyone here (and everywhere else) is a work in progress and that’s going to be true until the very last gasp. It’s not helpful to see any former MLCer here having issues with another former MLCer you weren’t and aren’t married to. So if you would, I’d like to know if any former MLCer here honestly thinks they have made a full recovery.
If so, if fully recovered, I would hope you’d see that one contributor’s conversation with those who find them kind and their story relevant shouldn’t be feeling dangerous to you. It doesn’t seem like it should affect you or your story, and for whatever any of it is worth to anyone, you could easily be offering similar insights on your own dedicated thread.
If not, if you yourself are still somewhat in recovery, why not back off on antagonizing anyone else who is still working on it.
Anyone is welcome to answer over at my thread or in PM. It’s sort of amusing that this thread keeps being derailed not by judgmental LBSs but by judgmental former MLCers.
Emphasis added for clarity. I prefer that you let my original post and this one both stand fully unedited.
There’s much to be said for the gift of former MLCers being willing to discourse and self-reflect for the benefit of the readership. I don’t know what it takes to be an titled moderator on any forum, and it looks like a difficult role to me, so I appreciate your stepping in on this thread. But I also see that your ask of me to edit my post exposes some slight bias. The crux of my post was to ask questions of those with a bone to pick, former or recovering MLCer
or otherwise, and I believe my wording was and is sound.
If it doesn’t apply to any one reader/contributor, that’s fine and I accept the unstated self-assessment of that person; answer is a gift but not required. Really this is just to move the dialogue along and hopefully to a direction of self-review that profits either the one self-assessing and/or any who come here in hope of learning more about how others behave. No harm is meant in my words.
Ready, thank you for your answers; I have read them on your thread and will follow up there.
NYM, sorry for the misperception; I hope you are not very bothered by it and that Song’s moderator comment and my response serve to clarify.
Song, thank you for comment and offer to help.
Shocks sis and Shockandawe, sorry for derailment. My questions stand, and answers are a gift but not required.
The main thing for anyone concerned about new LBS readers getting the wrong ideas or hopes up from reading this thread or any like it, is that every time you go to town on and in such a thread, your comments boost it right up to the top of the list. That means this thread is very likely to be one of the first a new member reads. Especially as any comment at all moves it closer to the 16th page and opening a new thread. I don’t see that it is a popularity contest, so much as a technical fact.
As time goes on, we are likely to see other former MLCers on board here. Whether and how they choose to disclose and discourse may be decided by the way we allow or impede the dialogue here on Shocks sis’s thread. Here’s hoping for more acceptance and insight than shrapnel, going forward.