Just the synapases? And what would the addict/MLCer synapses be passing if not the drug/high effect? Before they start taking drugs the addicts have synapses but the drugs seems to be what drives them nuts.
Or do you mean that addicts/MLCers synapses are different from non addicts/MLCers even before they start taking drugs/have MLC?
Sorry, I was abstruse. We all have the same starting set of neurotransmitters; certain drugs cause certain synapses to fire in parts of our brains. Especially in the affective parts of the brain, the amygdala and other places murky. And the faster those synapses fire, the less neurotransmitters they can build up again; the more and more drug required to get the original high (there are also receptor reasons for that, yeah pharmacology's complex
) and finally the blank stare of the burned-out druggie, sans any neurotransmitters to rub together, lacking the motivation to even get up to pee.
My H always warned me he had "an addictive personality" - something he thought he'd inherited from his dad and grandfather (the bottle). All the evidence I could see was a complete inability to stop himself from eating his way through an entire box of cookies after opening the packet! (...seriously, I had to hide 'em)
Then came the obsessive mountain climbing. Extreme exercise does provide an endorphin high, comparable to drugs. Chasing the dragon, ruining his body and flogging his mind. Not much different from addicts I've seen. At the end of each cycle came a burn-out that scared me. This was my H's MLC. That's why this analogy comes to me. Maybe some people are mentally more susceptible to MLC, like they're more susceptible to the lure of the bottle (or the cookie jar
).
"You have a right to action, not to the fruit thereof; shoot your arrow, but do not look to see where it lands." -Bhagavad Gita