1. How would you explain the correlation between age and onset? Women tend to all go into it at around 35-45, men around 45-55. Would you attribute this to hormonal changes?
There are some people who attribute some of these changes hormonal changes, such as Jed Diamond, in "The Irritable Male Syndrome"
http://www.menalive.com/ims-splash.htm. We know that hormones affect mood and behaviour, but also that very few men actually have a sudden drop in testosterone. For most of them, it's a gradual process, and this doesn't correlate to the sudden changes in behaviour that we denote as MLC or psychological crises.
The ages you cite as being typically MLC are not widely agreed upon. Not everyone goes through a crisis at midlife. Some go through crises at other ages (my H had an earlier one at 21); in fact Erikson says there are specific types of psychological crises at different ages. Other researchers say there is no evidence for MLC at all: see
http://www.apa.org/monitor/apr03/researchers.aspx2. How would you explain the consistency of bizarre behaviors exhibited such as the eyes, illogical thinking, overwhelming compulsion to run away, magical thinking etc.?
Why do you think there is a consistency in these behaviours? This forum, which is not a systematic, scientific basis for study, shows partners with a wide range of behaviours. For example, my H has never shown signs of magical thinking. All of the behaviours you mention are examples of defence mechanisms; they protect the ego at times of crisis. And all of us, including LBS, are susceptible.
3. You mention that there are not truly stages, and that stages can be skipped altogether. Can you enlighten me on some examples of this?
From this website, the myth of stages of dying, death and grief
http://grief.net/Myth%20of%20Stages.pdfIn other areas of psychology, stages are not inevitable, step-like and connected to maturation, but the result of psychological reorganisations as individuals mature in social contexts together with their care giver. See Schaffer's chapter in "An introduction to Vygotsky " by Harry Daniels, 2001.
As for MLC itself, Sherman ""there is as yet no evidence for developmental periods or 'stages' in the mid-life period" Edmund A. Sherman - 1987 "male mid-life crisis" - Psychology
4. Given your statements, do you believe that time frames are dependable in that this can take a certain minimum amount of time or do you believe that this can resolve in a shorter amount of time than what is generally believed here?
I don't think there is a minimum amount of time. I suppose that some people resolve their crisis quickly, so that it is not noticed much. I know one or two cases, personally. All it seemed to take was a couple of weeks retreat, and the individuals concerned realised what they wanted and what their response should be.
We are all here on the forum because of the deep crises we have in our lives, so these are longer term problems. The types of individual problems people have will also affect the outcome, as will their ability to find adaptive responses. Some people, as we know, manage to go through their whole lives without finding mature responses to the problems of life that they face.
5. What is the minimum amount of time that a person has gone through this that you know of, and do you believe that they truly "come of of a fog"?
As I said, a couple of weeks. But their crisis wasn't so deep.
Do any of us truly come out of our fogs? We are all human, all fallible, subject to our own perceptions, and there is no ultimate truth or pure perception of reality. We all have defence mechanisms to some degree. We can feel more certain of our decisions, less confused, and behave more consistently with our inner beliefs at some times than others. Is this "being out of the fog? " What if one person thought they were being rational and clear, and another thought they were delluding themselves? This happens all the time.
Lisa, I've just seen your reply, and I'll check out your book references. Thanks!
I don't think all MLC crisis corresponds to teenage behaviour (although sometimes they do seem to regress). The theory that parents have a hard time adjusting when their kids reach an age of their own maladjustment, is (as far as I can see) just a theory; there is no consistent, valid supporting evidence for this. (But please correct me if I'm wrong). Anecdotal experience doesn't count as evidence that it happens in the population in general.
Thanks OP.
which show that each decade there is a chance for a crisis.starting at 20 until 70
This also shows that hormones are not enough on their own. There are other factors too! But of course hormones affect us, and not just the main sex hormones, such as oestrogen, progesterone and testosterone. We are regular chemical banks of hormones, fuelled by the environment and food, which affect every aspect of our behaviour and thinking.