But I have nothing against things that work even if they are different from what is normally said here. I’m even one who has different view from what is (or was) standard in the board. I do not think MLC is just a FOO/development/identity thing, I think there are other things at stake. That goes “against” RCR basic ideas, yet, she was open enough to allow me to express my views and I often talk about in on threads, even newbies ones.
You know one person whose husband is in MLC and therapy is working. Excellent. Most here who tried were not so lucky. What should be said to newbies? That in most cases MC does not work with and MLCer, or that in most cases MC works with and MLCer? We say that in most cases it does not work, we don’t say it never works.
When newbies say they want to give it a try at MC, we say go for it, but if it does not work, don’t beat yourself up because in most cases it does not.
Don’t think that makes us close to new ideas…
Debating possible ways of mitigating a MLC is different from controlling the trip.
You have agreed to divorce your husband, detached, gave him time. So have many others here have. Why did it work for you and not for others?
Maybe because not all MLCers are alike and some crisis take longer than others.
Why don’t we have more reconciliations? The board is not that old, most MLCs take a long time. Many LBS give up or move forward. Also, there are people who reconcile but do not return to post about it.
Why do you think it is? Because the advice is bad? Is it better in other boards devoted to real MLC (again, many blogs, articles, boards, call MLC to midlife transition)? Is the success rate of a board as new as this higher? What do you suggest that is changed and how is that going to affect the outcome?
RCR thinks that the MLCer has to live the crisis to the end and nothing can be done. She got her husband, and marriage, back. How do you explain that? We have you (and me and a few others) who thing something can be done. Not all of us who think that way have our spouses back. We have RCR and others who think it is a developmental issue and it must run its course. Some of those have their spouses back. So, what is the way to go?...
There is certainly a wide range of ways of thinking and views in the board. Maybe you have not noticed, but there is.
Your story is inspiration as are the ones of many here.
I’m sorry if you are perceiving me as closed. That is an irony since I’ve always thought MLC can be mitigated and have had many heated discussions with other board members because of it. I have a scientific mind. If you tell me you have one case where it is working I’m going to be interested but I will tend to see what seems to work better for most cases. I will also want to know why a particular case is working with things that are different if the situation is the same. But that requires info. We have no info on your friend’s husband. That is, we do not know why therapy is working for him, only that it is working. Could you please provide more info? What makes his case different from most here?
32 supplements, Ready2?
That is huge lot of supplements…
Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together. (Marilyn Monroe)