I just want to add my bit here, too. I'm very disappointed by how the State handles divorce. It is given a cold look as if it were something unemotional. Emotions are not given any consideration, actually, they are frowned upon. There is no time for telling the judge how I feel, what my kids want, how I think my H behaved, how I worry he might behave.
Once my H asked for a separation the judge pretty much told me in basic words that he was no longer my husband and could do what he wanted (so shut up). And because it is an intimidating situation where your life and your kids livelihoods are being decided by someone who knows nothing about your family, you shut up because you are scared the judge will rule against you if he doesn't like how you talk. I found it to be a very unfair confrontation.
I think the State would do well to re-evaluate how they handle separations and divorces. If it is considered imperative to clear the judge's desk to save money and move cases along to the more 'important' ones, then the State should consider the after affects of divorce: impoverishment of both parties, debt, loss of earnings to spend in the market and boost the economy, devastated children who will most probably grow up to have problems in relationships, low self esteem, high chance they will go on to do the same in the future......I'm no good at numbers, but I can see very clearly how badly the money is being allocated here.