Amazon:
Paperback and
KindleApple iBook storeKoboBarnes & Noble (print and eBook)I actually came across this book in relation to my job, but I think it has excellent suggestions for peoples' personal growth as well. Michele Weiner-Davis of
Divorce Busting even gets mentioned.
I'm not recommending it as a way of "fixing" your MLCer, but perhaps as a way to improve interactions or to help in rebuilding when it comes time for reconciliation.
The book starts with an anecdote about a study that was conducted on people's eating habits. They offered people a bucket of free popcorn to enjoy when they went to see a movie in a theater; each person was given one bucket of popcorn (so there was no sharing), the popcorn was popped days before to be particularly unappetizing, and each person was either given a large bucket of popcorn or a medium-sized bucket.
What they found was that people who were given the larger buckets of popcorn ate more than the people who were given the smaller buckets. The popcorn was free, so price was not a factor (in fact, some people forgot that it was free and demanded their money back); it was old, bad-tasting popcorn so taste was unlikely to be a factor; and each person was given their own bucket, so it was unlikely that people were sharing their popcorn with others. Not only did people not believe that they ate more popcorn if they had the larger bucket, they actually
argued with the researchers, in spite of evidence to the contrary; they "knew" how much they ate!
The authors made the case that if the study was published without describing the difference in the size of the buckets, people would see that some people simply ate more popcorn than others. They would speculate about those peoples' eating habits and want to come up with a plan to teach people how to snack less or not overeat. In reality, the fix was simple; give people smaller portions and they're less likely to overeat. The point the authors made is that what may appear to be a personality or behavioral problem is actually a situational one; you don't necessarily have to change people's attitudes, you just have to change the circumstances.
They mentioned the Clocky, an alarm clock devised by a researcher at MIT. When you set Clocky to go off at a particular time it will actually roll off of the nightstand and run around the floor, forcing you to get out of bed and hunt it down to turn it off; according to the authors, "Clocky is not a product for a sane species; if Spock wants to get up at 5:45 am, he'll just get up." They describe humans as having two sides to our minds; there's the rational side (the superego) which can make reasoned, conscientious decisions, and the emotional side (the id) which is selfish and childlike. This dual nature to our personalities are why people throw out all of the junk food when they decide to go on a diet because although the rational side knows better than to eat the junk food, the emotional side wants a bowl of ice cream. The rational side wants to get out of bed at 5:45 so they can go for a jog in the morning, while the emotional side wants to stay curled up in the warm comfy bed as long as possible.
(
EDIT: Correcting a mistaken impression I made here) The authors cite Jonathan Haidt's metaphor from
The Happiness Hypothesis for this duality; the emotional side is the Elephant, and the rational side is the Rider. They do this to better illustrate the relationship they see between the two; the rational Rider can direct the emotional Elephant much of the time, but if the Elephant really wants to go somewhere or do something, there's not much the Rider can do to stop it. The Elephant is what makes you crave fast food when you should be dieting, call up your ex at 2 in the morning, and have that one cigarette that you know you shouldn't. The Rider can see the big picture and makes decisions that affect things in the long term. However, the Elephant also has strengths and the Rider has weaknesses. The Elephant is your drive and your motivation, the thing that provides you with the energy to make changes stick; the Rider can get bogged down in over-analyzing situations and being indecisive.
The authors also make the case that people's self-control is not limitless. The Rider can make you choose to start running every day in order to get in shape, but if the Elephant isn't engaged then you eventually lose the motivation to keep doing it. This is why change is so hard for many people; behaviors that are automatic or internalized are what is comfortable, and the Rider can only make you change those behaviors for a short time until he gets exhausted and you stop. At the same time, while a motivated Elephant will give you the drive to do what needs to be done, the Rider needs a clear plan of what to do or else he will get bogged down with indecision. The authors describe several examples where the more choices a person has, the less likely they are to make a choice at all, opting to stick with what is comfortable. A display that only has a few different flavors of jam will sell more jars than one that has 15 different flavors; it's easier to pick from A, B, or C than it is to pick from A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J... The authors state that "what often looks like resistance is often a lack of clarity."
They propose a simple three part-framework for effecting lasting change, both in ourselves and in people around us; the book is aimed at promoting change within organizations, even when the people effecting the change has little real power or authority to do so. The three parts are:
- Direct the Rider
- Motivate the Elephant
- Shape the Path
I'll add to this thread as I make my way through the book. Others who have read the book, or pick up a copy and want to contribute to the discussion are welcome to do so.
Me: 45, Her: 40. Married 16 1/2 years, together(-ish) 20.
Status: BD 8/25/09, she moved out 8/28/10. No talk of D.
Every day is another chance to get it right.
http://www.vachss.com/mission/behavior.html"Counting days won't buy us years" —Wings by HAERTS
"Forgiveness means giving up all hope for a better past." —Lily Tomlin
"When we commit to our lovers, we implicitly promise to forgive them. There is no other way we can live with someone for better or worse or until death do us part." —Dr. Frederic Luskin