I was responding to OP, regarding what we think of the first blog post, hence the comment that the first part is similar to the main site.
Well, to me, if it is midlife transition it only applies to midlife. Transitions and crisis can happen at any age but if it says midlife it can only be related to something that goes on in midlife.
I’m more concerned with the general pathologize of OW than with pathologise MLC. MLC is an abnormal situation/condition of midlife transition, the OW most of the times does not suffer from the mental illness LBS tend to attach to them. They may have symptoms, but so do we all, on occasions.
ADD/ADHD means something is wrong/out of the ordinary/in disorder. That does not make you, the person, wrong, but ADD is a disorder. MLC, for me, is a disorder. The normal is midlife transition. MLC is the disorder mode of midlife transition. All MLCs imply depression. Depression is a medical condition. I know you don’t see MLC depression as clinical depression but depression is depression, from light to severe. I don’t see how you can have an exception for MLC. Depression in adolescence, even if part of teenage years, is still depression.
I think the psychological/emotional is affected by the biological condition of the MLCer. Of course, then, the psychological/emotional condition ends up influencing the biological condition.
We know very little how alcohol really works on the brain but we know that, at a point, if is not so simple as to choose. Choose for me implies possibility. For some it is not possible to give up. Or not for a long time.
For me it makes a huge difference if it is a choice or a compulsion. I will not forgive, accept or even exchange a word with a person who choose to do what Mr J is doing. Sorry if I sound hard but if someone is doing all this in their right mind, well, they’re a monster and not a MLC one. If, on the other hand, they are battling compulsions/something is wrong the situation is different.
My background is History, Philosophy, Art, and Classic Culture. No biology or chemistry since the 9th grade until this MLC stuff come along. Jung was part of our college studies, and Jung was the reason I found the board. Jung terms: Self, Shadow; Reintegration make perfect sense for MLC, even without going into the neurobiological stuff. But the neurobiological stuff can explain how the personality changes and all the alterations we see in our MLCers.
I think there can be both situations. Some may be stuck because they realised the LBS gave up on them (even if I’m not certain how most MLCers have a clue if the LBS gave up or did not gave up on them. Clingers may have close relationship with the LBS but not all MLCers are close to the LBS) and some come out of the crisis and, finding nothing they consider worthy, dive into depression and remain damaged. No longer the same depression as in MLC. This may be more obvious with Replayers than with Wallowers.
I kind of have that struggle even if I’m not standing. Mr J has no reason to come out of the tunnel. He has no wife, no children, no marital home, none of our previous joint projects, nothing. All he has is clubbing. If he leaves clubbing la la la land and friends he will find himself on a void of nothingness. He is in a void of futility but at least he is making money and has the recognition of his peers.
The only thing that MR J has to hang to is me but I’ve made it clear I want to divorce and have a family and that he is not included in those family plans. So, did I condemn him to be stuck or did the fact that he was taking too long in Replay took me to make it clear I wanted to move on and he was not on board? … The second, I think, since I only putted it on black and white late Summer 2011.
Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together. (Marilyn Monroe)